
|
Issue
5 - January 30, 2004
|
|
|
|

The
Rio Grande River is the international
border.
|
| |
You
Told Us
|
|
The
Top Issues for 2004 have been loud and clear:
#1 Immigration:
“The
most important issue facing Texas
in 2004 and
beyond is our open border. The "correct"
thing by the liberal courts is to allow Texas
and the other
states to become the working part of Mexico
. It seems
that we have the federal law that any child born
on U.S. soil is an American Citizen with all rights
and privileges, and since the newborn cannot support
itself, then the birth mother, father and all
siblings are welcome to come here and care for
the infant ... go to school, get a drivers license,
be on welfare ………
E.
H. from Hopkins County
“Do
we want our state to become another Mexifornia?
Native Californians are leaving their state in
droves, taking their businesses with them. So
many of their problems can be traced back to their
massive invasion of illegal aliens. We Texans
need to launch a major lobbying effort asking
President Bush to resume the enforcement of our
existing immigration laws…………If Mexico can seal
their southern border, why can't we?”
M.W.
from Austin
#2 School Finance and Education
#3 Water
Rights
Watch for
the next few issues. Your responses have been
great. Hope you don't mind if we share some of
your comments. We will to cover what is important
to you and welcome your input.
|
| Watch
for Trial Lawyers Loose on the Campaign Trail
by
Janelle Shepard
|
After
announcing the 2003 True Texan would go to State
Representative Joe Nixon, I received feedback
from many personal injury and medical malpractice
attorneys. Most messages had to be deleted before
my monitor melted. Yes, their lives have drastically
changed. One friend told me that every personal
injury lawyer he knew was hunting for the one
ca$e that would $et him up for a lifetime. (Can
you say: “the Texas Tobacco 5?”)
Some
trial lawyers are so mad about “Ten
Gallon Tort” they are running for office.
All across Texas there is huge increase in lawyers
filing for office as Republicans. Even the Texas
Republican Chairwoman, Tina Benkiser is being
challenged by a medical malpractice lawyer, Gina
Parker, who declared her determination to take
over the GOP months before the June convention.
How uncomfortable is that? In years past the Democrats
were synonymous with trial lawyers. (note: Benkiser
is an attorney that heartily supports tort reform)
As
the population of trial lawyers in the state legislature
dwindled along with the Democrats, the chances
of tort reform have increased. The population
of regular citizens in the legislature has increased
with the new majority of Republicans in Austin
. small business owners, retirees, farmers, ranchers,
insurance agents, doctors and teachers are running
the state now. The attorney population is an estimated
40%. After decades of making laws that made their
profession wealthy at the expense of other professions,
some Texas trial attorneys will have to make an
honest living like everyone else.
The
cover of Newsweek magazine in December declared:
Lawsuit
Hell Civil Wars
Doctors.
Teachers. Coaches. Ministers. They all share a
common fear: being
sued on the job.
continued
|
What is the most important issue for Texas in 2004?
Keep sending us your thoughts! Email
us today.
Your feedback has been great.
Texans
For Texas
welcomes you. As you know, Texas is always changing
and evolving. Likewise, our group of grassroots leaders
have been evolving into a better machine for the purposes
of educating, energizing, and motivating the conservative
citizens of Texas about public policy and issues.
Our staff is listed below. Scattered across the state
with diverse backgrounds, we will share truth and shed
light on facts that are not normally found in today’s
media coverage. Please send us your comments.
SUBSCRIBE
Send
a blank email to subscribe@tx4tx.org with
SUBSCRIBE in the subject line or click
here and hit send. To optout, send a blank
email to remove@tx4tx.org with
REMOVE in the subject line or click
here and hit send.
All subscription requests are processed within 2 weeks.
|
|
Letter
to Teachers on Teacher Absences
by Royal Masset
My
last column "Teacher Absences vs. Student Absences"
received an avalanche of extremely angry responses
from teachers. It clearly hit a nerve. One response
was the following:
“What
an angry and sad person you portray yourself to
be. Our unions here are simply for the purpose of
collective bargaining and have no influence on whether
one is hired or not. One who hides behind his computer
spouting out inflammatory diatribe is cowardly.
Your year of teaching in public school hardly qualifies
you to criticize persons in the teaching profession.
If you think I'm arrogant, I'm quite okay with that.
I also graduated with honors from an ivy league
school and hold two master's degrees besides. I
choose not to continue this pissing contest with
you. You sound like a perpetual victim who has no
other defense than to tear others down. How very
sad for you. Respond if you wish, but I can assure
you, I will not waste my time reading it”
Most
responses were very conscientious and provided me
with 2 or 3 pages of details. After answering a
few individually I started responding with the following
core message:
I
should have rephrased my entire discussion about
"doing away with personal days". Unfortunately
I am only supposed to write a short column and can't
go into the comprehensive details I would like.
How
would this sound to you--allowing teachers to take
the same number of personal days they do now at
the same pay rate. But if a teacher chooses to not
take personal days they get paid the same rate extra
for each day they don't take off. In other words,
a teacher who takes no personal days off would earn
about 2% more than the pay they were entitled to.
Here
is the core of my concern. A great many teachers
probably do not take any personal time off because
they love their children and don't want to be absent.
When I taught for a year in Florida I never missed
one day. I loved my children. But it is also true
that there is a universal attitude toward
personal leave days of "use it or lose it."
Why should we penalize the teacher who doesn't take
personal leave and give him or her the same salary
as the one who does? Why not develop a system that
minimizes the use of personal leave days?
continued
ARTICLE
ARCHIVES
Read
Previous Articles
RECOMMENDED
LINKS
|
|
|
|
For
more information regarding Texans For Texas, please contact Janelle
Shepard, Exec. Director
To subscribe to The Capitol Update, click
here. To unsubscribe,
click
here. All subscription requests are processed
immediately.
Texans for Texas, Inc, 815-A Brazos St #384, Austin, TX 78701-9996.©
2003 Texans For Texas, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|