Texans For Texas

Pat O’Grady
79th Legislative Session (2005) Pre-Filed Bill Analysis
Pat O’Grady,
 Chief Operating Officer
Texans For Texas, Inc.

As of Sunday, December 5, 2004, the Texas House of Representatives members have filed 192 bills and the Texas Senate members have filed 102 bills. This total excludes Senate and House Resolutions (only six House Resolutions have been filed to date) which are used to honor individuals.

Of the 294 pre-filed bills, there are eleven (11) House Joint resolutions (HJR) which are all intended to change the Texas Constitution. The Senators have filed four (4) Senate Joint Resolutions (SJR) with the same intent.

The Senate Constitutional Amendments are:

1.
SJR6 (Carona) Requiring a record vote on “certain” legislative actions.
2.
SJR7 (Carona) Concerning Line of Credits for Reverse Mortgages.
3.
SJR8 (Shapleigh) Imposing time limits on when Redistricting may be accomplished.
4.
SJR9 (Shapleigh) Creating a “consolidated Metro Government” for El Paso County and the city of El Paso.

The House of Representatives Constitutional Amendments are:

1.
HJR6 (Chisum) Defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
2.
HJR11 (Branch) Defining a “quorum” for the Legislature as a majority (changed from two-thirds).
3.
HJR12 (Branch) Defining a “quorum” for the Legislature as two-thirds of the members of each house, excluding those who the presiding officer deems to be absent from the state.
4.
HJR13 (Branch) Requiring a record vote on final passage of a bill (with exceptions) and to publish the record vote on the Internet.
5.
HJR14 (Naishtat) Allowing the Governor to declare a moratorium on executions.
6.
HJR15 (Rodriguez) Proposing a state income tax with some fuzzy language about redistribution of tax liability.
7.
HJR16 (Wong) Allowing the Legislature to limit the maximum average annual increase in the appraised value of real property to five percent or more.
8.
HJR17 (Pena) Requiring a house or committee of the legislature to take a record vote on certain legislative measures and actions.
9.
HJR18 (Chavez) Exempting the taxation of the sale or use of certain food, drinks, medicine, and child-care services.
10.
HJR19 (Talton) Defining marriage as one man and one woman and prohibiting “legal” recognition of other forms of civil union.
11.
HJR20 (Hilderbran) Exempting political subdivisions from unfunded legislative mandates with EXCEPTIONS.

Beyond the Constitutional Amendments, which will receive considerable interest, an analysis of bills by specific codes/acts gives a good overview of Legislative priorities. There may be several different ways to dissect and categorize these 294 bills, but the easiest (and most accessible by Texas citizens) is from the Legislative Reference Library (LRL). In this analysis there is NOT a one-to-one relationship between bills and affected codes. For example the 15 Constitutional Amendments above affect 19 different sections of the Constitution. Some bills will affect several different codes and some will affect only one code.

For all of our readers another tool exists for you to determine the priorities of your representative or senator. This web page (http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlo/mytlo/authlist.htm) will enable you to select your personal Rep/Senator and see what he or she thinks is important. Click here for a MS Word document that contains a brief synopses (for categories affected by less than 100 bills) and live links to the bills which are referenced in the LRL categories. If the number is greater than 100, you can use the link indicated to get a complete list of the bills.

The LRL web site lists 32 categories of bills. These categories include 30 Codes/Acts and two other categories of “Session Laws” and “No Reference”. Those bills which are intended to revise previous session laws are include in that category and those wherein no code is referenced is included in that category. The categories sorted by number of bills affecting each category is shown below. Remember that of the 294 bills currently filed 1,629 categories are affected!

Several cautions are necessary while digesting this mathematical analysis. While it is easy to apply numbers to numerical bills and numerical codes affected, it is very difficult to try to quantify time and/or work load when “the human factor” is added to the analysis. For instance, there may be 100 (or any number you choose) of the Tax Code issues on which all members agree and those can be easily brought to the floor quickly (after going through the necessary legislative process), while others may consume a great amount of time. Additionally, expect many of them to be “killed” in committee. With that in mind let’s begin with the aforementioned erroneous (just kidding) analysis.

The table below suggests that over half (almost 55%) of this next legislative session will be consumed by tax and education issues. That should really come as no surprise to any observer of Texas politics, especially in light of the recent 126 page legislation from the judicial bench (is that legal?)! Robin Hood has been declared unconstitutional by a liberal judge. Remember that it was originally put into force by a ruling from another liberal judge. We may have a trend here!

When you add Government Code, Health & Safety Code, and Insurance Code issues to the tax and education issues, three-fourths (74%) of the legislation session is already taken. That leaves ¼ of the 140 days (35 days), for the 79th Legislative Session (2005) to consider other issues. Based on the 78th session (2003) and subsequent special sessions, a considerable amount of time may be spent on issues related to the constitutional amendment by Sen. Shapleigh on redistricting. After holidays in Oklahoma and New Mexico 16-18 months ago, there are probably some members of each side waiting to extract their own “pound of flesh” from the other side. For the sake of all Texas citizens, hopefully the importance of School finance will prevail and this session will not deteriorate into the partisanship of two years ago!

Income Tax and Sour GrapesTwo of the Constitutional Amendments are useless and frivolous and should be Thrown Away immediately. The first from Representative Rodriguez for an Income Tax, should be tossed into the closest circular file and left there for eternity to turn into compost. Second, Senator Shapleigh’s shameless “sour grapes” amendment on redistricting should get all of the attention it deserves – NONE! Stay tuned as we look deeper into some of the pre-filed legislation emanating from the minds of elected officials.

 

ARTICLE ARCHIVE
PREVIOUS ISSUES

HOME


Pat O'Grady is a proud VietNam veteran, retired Air Force officer. U.S. Air Force Academy grad and an MBA from the University of Redlands, CA. Architect of the 2001 State Board of Education redistricting plan. Pat now serves as Chief Operating Officer of Texans For Texas, Inc.